Showing posts with label Soccer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soccer. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2014

The Evolution of US Soccer; how player race and background has changed over the years






Although the United States had qualified for the 1990 in Italy the beginning of the Modern Era in US soccer began on June 18, 1994. When Alexi Lalas and his ginger beard led the denim clad Americans out on the field for a 1-1 draw, a revolution began. The 1990 team featured players still in college and many playing for semi-pro teams. In 1994, over half the team had been playing together for the US Soccer Federation leading up to the cup and zero college kids. That is not the dynamic shift that needs to be talked about. That team that found a way to qualify for the round of 16 featured 7 foreign born players, was 90% white, and whose hometowns had an average median income of $74,737. Jurgen Klinsman’s use of players whose fathers were in the military and had children with Europeans isn’t exactly new to American soccer; 2 players on that 1994 team were born that exact way.
Since that 1994 World Cup the United States Soccer Team has seen a drastic change in who makes up the team. Not only has the team become much more diverse in terms of ethnicities of the players but it also brings in players from parts of the countries that were completely ignored in 1990. As you will see, not only has the level of American soccer improved, but so has their utilization of American citizens. Those latter probably has a lot to do with the first.

Where The Players are From
The usage of foreign players by the United States is an interesting story, in 1994 and 1998, managed by Yugoslavian Bora Milutinovic and American Steve Sampson respectively, the US brought 7 players born outside of the United States. This can be chalked up to the fact that American soccer was very weak at the time and to fill out the roster they needed to find anyone they could to play for the stars and stripes. Bruce Arena managed the United States for the 2002 and 2006 World Cups. When the US made an incredible run to the quarterfinals in 2002 they brought 5 foreign players, 3 of whom had been to the 1998 World Cup. After 2002 however there seemed to be a revolt against foreign players as Bruce Arena announced that Pablo Mastroeni would be the only foreign born player in the 2006 squad. The 2010 team managed by Bob Bradley again only included foreign player, Benny Feilhaber, who was born in Brazil but who grew up in Scarsdale, New York (median income of over $200,000), was not exactly your typical immigrant.
When Jurgen Klinsmann took over the team in 2011 following the US’s embarrassing loss to Mexico in the ’11 Gold Cup Final, he made it a point to find as many players as possible who held US Citizenship. When the US took off for Brazil over a quarter of the team (6 players) was born somewhere other than the United States and many more had parents who were immigrants. This was the highest percentage since the 1998 World Cup.
The book Soccernomics explored how England rejected middle and upper class players from their squads. Only 5 of 34 players that the authors were able to establish an occupation for their fathers from the 1998, 2002, and 2006 World Cups came from middle or upper-middle class families. Soccer in the United States actually tells the complete opposite story as only 1 player on the 1994 roster came from a hometown that had a median income below the national average. That one player was Mike Sorber from St. Louis, Missouri, who went to a catholic high school and then went to private St. Louis University when soccer scholarships were not abundant, so he probably was not very lower class.
As the years went on more and more middle class players were included on the national team but it was not until 2006 that there were players who came from “poor” cities on the team. Both Eddie Johnson and Clint Dempsey come from towns with a median income below $28,000. The inclusion of poorer players caused the average median income for the players to drop below $65,000 for the 2006 and 2014 World Cups. The 2010 team had an average median income of $72,000 but if you would exclude Feilhaber, who as mentioned earlier came from a very ritzy neighborhood, the average also drops below $65,000. This is a stark contrast to the second and third world cup teams of the 90s, who averaged $75,737 in 1994 and $77,561 in 1998.


Who the Players Are
72.4% White
16.4% Hispanic
8.7% White Hispanic
12.2% non-Hispanic Black


Those are the demographics of the United States. The closest the US national team has ever come to representing the actual number of whites in this country was 2006 when 66.6% of the team was white. The 2010 team was exactly half white and both the 2014 World Cup squad and the squads for the first three post world cup have had more minorities than whites.
When the US took the field for the 1994 World Cup Cobi Jones was the only black member of the team. The other nonwhite member of the team was Earnie Stewart, who had one black parent and one white parent. Everyone else on the team was white. 5 members of the team were white Hispanics but the first appearance of someone with indigenous blood did not occur until 2002 when Pablo Mastroeni appeared on the World Cup roster. All indigenous players for the US had come from a Latin American Country until 2014, when Deandre Yedlin (who is a mix of Latvian, Black, and Native American) impressed the world with his performance in Brazil which led to a contract with Tottenham.

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

How the United States' 2014 World Cup compares to 2010

Jurgen Klinsmann has come under fire for the USMNT's performance at the 2014 World Cup. The main reason for the lack of confidence is that the US fared no better during this year's version of the cup than in 2010; both exits in the first stage of knockout rounds in extra time. Those critics don't realize that they are comparing apples to oranges when debating the US performances in both 2010 and 2014. The USMNT faced different schedules each time; "group of death" for 2014 and a relatively easy group in 2010. To see which World Cup was more impressive we will see how international oddsmakers expected them to do in each edition.

As you can see by looking at the above image (plus you know how to read odds; the lower the number, the better the odds are of that event of occurring) the US was expected get 6 points in the 2010 group stage (good enough for second place) and then win their Round of 16 match against Ghana. However, what actually happened was the US won the group (on goal differential against England) with a mere 4 points and were eliminated in extra time by Ghana.
On the other hand, the 2014 Von Trapps overachieved greatly. The oddsmakers expected them to leave Brazil without a single point. Jurgen and the boys were able to pull of the upset against Ghana and were a mere sixty seconds of doing the same to Portugal. All said, the US took second place in the group with 4 points (plus beating Portugal on goal differential). Even in the Round of 16 with their extra time loss to Belgium the US overachieved by pushing the game into extra time.
This concludes that despite the US leaving as early in 2014 as they did in 2010, they had a much better showing in 2014 due to their tougher schedule.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Ranking Instant Replay in Sports

  Instant replay has been used for officiating purposes since 1985 (to the best of my knowledge) when the USFL tinkered with it and the NFL followed the next year. Many purists claim that the use of it takes away the human error from the game, and that the officials are just as much part of the game as the players. The problem with that is that the players are the ones playing the games and therefore the ones that should be deciding the match, not the referees. As someone that has officiated both baseball and ice hockey (baseball at much higher level than ice hockey), I would very much appreciate help in certain calls. There are some plays that are just bang bang and although at the youth level you can't have instant replay you can have it at the professional level. Sports such as baseball, soccer, and football have a problem where a play can be called dead when it should not be, and the only way to fix that is to let close plays go and fix it afterward. Here is my ranking of 7 sports that are popular in America that use instant replay:

Hawk Eye Tennis Review 
1. Tennis
  Tennis has had a review system since the 2006 US Open where players were allowed so many challengers per set. The most common technology used in tennis the Hawk-eye system which uses slow-motion footage to decide whether or not the ball was in or out.
Pros: Around 30% of challenges are successful which is actually pretty high cause that means that officials are only 70% effective. Tennis is a good sport for instant replay because tennis players officiate themselves at a young age so they have a better idea of in or out calls and won't be as likely to waste challenges as they do in other sports.
Cons: None
Possible Improvements: I guess you could make Hawk-eye even more accurate.



2. Ice Hockey
  Instant replay has been used by the NHL to determine whether or not a goal is actually goal since 1991. The league office has also been using it in recent years to punish players who participate in dirty play. The goal review is used to make sure the puck crosses the line and that the puck wasn't put into the net illegally. Goals toward end of period are also reviewed to make sure they crossed line before end of period
Pros: every goal is reviewed by video goal judge while play is stopped after goal to prevent delay in game, referee and video goal judge are only ones allowed to call for instant replay, very accurate
Cons: depends on the the home or national broadcast to feed footage(problem in Pittsburgh few years back where douche bag the station director didn't provide all footage and it ended up costing the Flyers, the Flyers still won cause the Penguins are bitches)

Possible Improvements: league can set up own cameras

3. Basketball
  The NBA began using instant replay in the 2002-2003 season to see if a buzzer-beater shot left the hands of the shooter with more than .02 seconds left on the clock. Later, the NBA started to use instant replay to decide which players were involved in fights and deciding if fouls were flagrant or not. It can also be used to fix clock malfunctions as well as deciding if a shot was worth two or three shots. If a player was fouled on said shot it can determine how many free throws the player gets. The NCAA uses replays for reviews of fights, buzzer beaters, determining two-pointer or three-pointer, and to see which player was fouled in order to determine who takes the free throw.
Pros: covers most situations, refs get to decide when to use it
Cons: could add more situations to be reviewed
Possible Improvements: use it to punish players who flop, out of bounds calls

4. College Football
  The Big Ten started using instant replay in 2004 and most conferences followed suit in 2005. By 2006, the NCAA made instant replay part of the rules. Although there is no unified code for instant replay, reviews can come from either a coach's challenge or from the video review official up in the press box. Most fouls cannot be challenged except for illegal forward pass and passing interference (only to wipe it off if ball was tipped before hand). Catches, down or not
Pros: replay can be initiated by official, usually very few challenges per game
Cons: coach's can challenge (which means there are either wasted challenges or teams get punished for challenging a call they sincerely thought was wrong), dead balls can't be reviewed (no way to fix that except to let play go on and fix later)
Possible Improvements: NCAA needs to have same replay rules for each conference

5. NFL
  The reason for the split between NCAA and NFL football is that the NFL pretty much solely relies on coach's challenges instead of a third party to initiate reviews. The plays reviewable for college and professional are pretty much the same. NFL began using replay in 1985 but the current system wasn't adopted until 1999.
Pros: all scoring plays reviewed,
Cons: coach's challenges (see college football), dead balls can't be reviewed (see college football), booth challenges only allowed in last two minutes of half and overtime
Possible improvemnts: BOOTH REVIEWS ONLY

6. Baseball
  Instant replay made its debut in baseball during the 2008 playoffs to determine whether or not a home run occurred. Fan interference, fair or foul, and whether or not a ball crossed the fence are eligible to be reviewed.  The new Collective Bargaining Agreement which is currently being negotiated plans on expanding replay to all fair or foul calls, all fan interference, and whether or not the ball is caught. If those changes are put into play, baseball will shoot up the rankings but they haven't happened yet.
umps running off to use replay
Pros: they finally put it in, game does not get delayed too much, umpires call for review not pitcher
Cons: not enough plays reviewed
Possible Improvements: add current proposed replayable plays as well as runner interference and fielder obstruction, as well as umpire's interference, possibly foot on bag or not, problem is that baseball depends on one call to effect how the rest of the play plays out

7. Soccer
  Soccer still doesn't use any type of instant replay and so far the only technology I've seen them use walkie-talkies and temporary spray paint to mark where the wall can stand. FIFA's 2010 World Cup was covered by blown calls and they can fix this. The only problem is that FIFA is unwilling to change, in fact FIFA's president Sepp Blatter claims that blown calls add to the "fascination and popularity of football."(he can't be too bright, he helped Qatar get a world cup) The good news is that FIFA is looking into using the Hawk-eye technology that tennis uses to determine whether or not the ball crosses the goal line. 
Douche Bag Idiot
Sepp Blatter
Pros: None
Cons: None cause it doesn't exist
Possible Improvements: review all goals to make sure players weren't offsides and that a handling of the ball didn't help the scorer, goals that are scored directly after an incorrect offsides call can be reversed, assistant ref can push button for assistance on who gets throw, corner kick, or goal kick, and of course technology to decide whether or not ball crossed line





Wednesday, June 27, 2012

What the MLS Needs to Do


                With the MLS struggling to have its popularity reach the levels of the NBA, MLB, NFL or even NHL. It cannot be argued though, that the MLS hasn’t found a nice niche in the middle of the American sports scene. The MLS has die hard fans that show up to almost every game just as any other sport does, but it lacks the attendance of the so called casual fan. In the past, the MLS would have tried to tinker with the rules of soccer in ways such as having  the clock run down, altering the number of substitutions allowed in a game, or going through many ways of resolving tie. For the MLS to become immensely popular in the United States it needs to change a few simple things and most of them revolve around one thing; a mass influx of money into the league.

                The MLS has depended on the college and high school American players as long as Southern and Central American players to fill rosters since their inception which works well but they could improve that talent pool as well as expanding their roster bases. By pouring money into the youth development process in the United States players will be able to get better coaching as well as have more time to develop their skills. Most teams already have U23 teams and have academy set up but they need to adjust how they are run. The MLS draft should become the main way for players to enter the MLS, no more homegrown talent contracts. A team can enter anyone in the CONCACAF soccer region that is at least 16 years of age and once selected a player can choose between not signing, signing an amateur contract, or signing a professional contract. Teams will possess the rights of any player that doesn’t sign until that player becomes 23 or until they sign with a professional club outside of the United States. Players that sign amateur contract will still be able to play high school and college soccer but over the summer they will play for the MLS team’s amateur development team. Draftees that sign professional contracts will start playing for either the club’s U23, U18, or first team. The best high school soccer and college players that are not professionally signed could all be moved to a central location where they could play together for high school. They would stay with host families in a program similar to the US Hockey Development program.
                Now that the MLS has a solid foundation for developing US talent they need to find away to bring not only the best American players but the best players from around the world. By setting up youth academies in soccer hotbeds across the world the MLS will be able bring in International players that it wasn’t able to in the past. Now just because they have scouts and academies in other countries doesn’t mean that they will get the players, they need to be able to offer more money for those players than teams in Europe would be able to. Now once the MLS starts bringing in young international players the United States can start to give them citizenship so that they can one day play for the US national team. Instead of bringing in old European talent the MLS should try to loan young European players that are having trouble making their clubs first team. This would not only increase the talent level of the MLS but it would also bring European interest into the league as well.
                The MLS should differentiate its game from the International game by including overtime in the rules. Now they don’t need to go back to their shootout idea from the past but they should play a standard 2 halve, 15 minute overtime to try to resolve a tie after 90 minutes. If after the overtime periods there is a tie, then the game ends in a tie. In the playoffs, the MLS should avoid having shootouts by developing an alternative way to end the game. One way would be to have 20 minute periods of sudden death overtime with each team allowed one extra sub per overtime period. Another way the MLS can separate itself in a good way would be to include technology to help the officials out. The use of goal line technology to make sure that the ball actually crosses the line could help prevent controversy as well as having the game decided by the players. Replay could also be used to review each goal to make sure offsides or any other offense did not happen. Offsides calls could not be reversed once called unless the call was made after the ball has entered the net.
                Another thing the MLS should do is not change. The MLS should not change its schedule so that it agrees with that of Europe and should continue its summer season because that is the most appropriate time for an outdoor sport in North America. Promotion and Relegation has been called for before but the MLS needs strong franchises with fan bases in order to survive. Once the league becomes successful no one would want to see a major league team demoted in favor of a team of scrubs. In fact, it would make more sense if teams would create development contracts with some of the minor US soccer teams.
                The MLS isn’t far away from being a top soccer league in terms of time but the talent is well off. If the MLS can find billionaires to back teams the United States could become the hum for club soccer. Football is dying in the US as more and more players are suffering the long term consequences of soccer and soccer could fill the void. All they would have to do is become a summer-fall sport instead of a spring-summer sport and they would be the only league in town. Soccer can be appreciated in the US if there is good soccer in the US to watch.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Draw to Begin Euro 12


Opening Ceremony Before Game 
Lewandoski heading the ball to give Poland a 1- nil lead

                Poland and Greece were set up to begin Euro 2012 in front of a predominately Polish crowd which forced Greece to play in a very tough environment. This game was crucial in deciding who would advance from the group considering Russia and Czech Republic are the other members of the group and there is no clear favorite. The tone for the game was set when the Spanish referee Carlos Carballo called a foul for simple hand play on a long pass by Poland. This one call showed the difference in styles of football from country to country. Spain prefers a more strategic game with passing compared to countries that actually have testicles such as Germany and England where they are allowed to touch each other. Poland was able to control possession early and had very series of chances that ended with Maciej Rybus missing a shot and giving Greece a goal kick. 10 minutes later Poland missed another fantastic opportunity on a cross by Lukasz Piszczek skimmed by Robert Lewandowski’s head. Poland’s strategy of crossing finally paid off at the end of the 17th minute when a goal by Lewandoski off of a fantastic cross by Eugen Polaski.
                Greece finally got their frist decent chance in the 26th minute on a long shot by Katsouranis but he missed high and wide. After a brief attack by Poland, Greece was able to have its first sustained attack of the game which cultivated with them having a free kick. After Ninis attempted the free kick too soon they gave their plan a way(which may have worked) and were unable to capitalize on the second attempt. The missed free kick resulted in a brief Polish counter attack. In the 35th minute Papastathopoulos was given a bull shit yellow card for winning a header, a second example of how Spanish refs should stay in the domestic league where they play touch soccer instead of a game that takes physical ability. After the card, Poland had another great opportunity when the free kick was redirected right to the feet of Damien Perquis inside the 18 but was unable to put the ball into the net.
                Polish captain Jakub Blaszczykowski outhustled the entire Greece defense to give Poland another attack on net. This may be the story of the first half in which Poland dominated the game through energy, even though possession was almost even Poland was able to get more attempts thorough hustle and focus. Greece did just not seem to be all there in the first half. They made many inaccurate passes and often just didn’t get all of the ball.  The officiating in the first half was atrocious as Papastathopoulos was sent off with his second yellow for just being there while a Polish player fell down. In the 47th minute Carballo gave yellow cards to Greek players for arguing a close calls, he is simply out of his league. He was even awful in domestic play as he administered 16 red cards in 19 la Liga matches in Spain this past year.
"Salpy" provided much energy off the bench giving Greece
a goal and drawing a penalty
                The second half started the same way as the first with Poland able to get out on a quick attack. Greece was able to score in the 51st minute when Marcin Wasilewski of Poland cut off his goalie Szczesny from a cross on the right side which redirected to the substitute Dimitris Salpingidis who put the ball into the net. In the 60th minute Carballo made a questionable decision to not card Salpingidis when he performed a late tackle. Carballo has been booking people for not reason but when something seems worthy of a card he keeps it in his pocket. Greece’s second half was much more impressive as they had much more energy racing to loose balls that Poland would have easily had in the first half. Greece did start to dive around the 60th minute which slowed down the game possibly hinting at them being tired.
Tyton stops the penalty to preserve the draw
                Carballo made his first good call of the night as he dismissed Szczesny from the game for his tackle of Salpingidis inside the 6 after Salpy missed the ball. That dismissal put substitute goalkeeper Tyton in a tough position but he comes up huge by saving Karagounis’ penalty and in the process saving his starter. Greece had another huge opportunity as Salpy put the ball in the net but it was taken back as one of his teammates was called for offsides. Poland had a great chance in the 80th minute when they had the ball in the box but Ludovic Obraniak waited too long to do anything and dribbled right out of bounds. Greece responded with a great chance of their own but the long haired Samaras kicked the ball about 50 meters in the air. Poland had many attempts in the last 15 minutes but they have been sloppy, either getting no pace on the ball or crossing the ball to where no one is. With 10 on 10 soccer one would expect the game to open up but neither side was able to put the ball in the net during extra time. In extra time, Poland mustered one corner kick but both sided played much uninspired soccer which resulted in a 1-1 draw.
Idiot and Star of the game: Carlos Carballo
                In the end, both teams were most likely happy to come away with a draw as they both didn’t play very well. Poland had many chances on net but failed to capitalize on them other than one header in the first half. Greece played an awful in the first half with porous defense that allowed Poland constant strikes on net. The right side of the field was wide open for Poland in the first but when it came to the second, they either stopped trying to go to it or Greece was able to force Poland to the middle. Greece’s offense came out in the second half when they were able to get to the net through crosses and they were finally able to put one into the back of the net. This result put neither team in a good position to advance but doesn’t hurt. My favorites in this group are Russia and the Czech Republic  with the winner of their matchup being the winner.